* "but then end up" -> "yet ending up"
Earlier part was written as "claiming to be", so the logical outcome
would be "ending up" instead of "end up".
"but then" is replaced with "yet" to make the text less repetitive with
"then".
* "But then" -> "After that"
Make "then" less redundant.
* "libtertarian" -> "libertarian"
Clearly a typo.
* "if their claims actually match reality or not" ->
"whether their claims actually match reality"
Paraphrasing, nothing serious here.
"I'm accepting donations" -> "I accept donations"
Present continuous is definitely not the way to state this.
"/glossory#cuckflare" -> "/glossary#cuckflare"
Taken as a typo.
* "disgarded" -> "discarded"
Possibly a typo.
* "Any spam is subject to niggerlisting." ->
"Any spam is subjected to niggerlisting."
It would be easy to just append an article before "subject", but I am
not sure whether "spam" is countable without a noun (like "spam
correspondence").
* "Any such complains shall [...]" -> "Such complaints shall [...]"
"Complains" is a verb. Use "complaints" for noun instead.
"Any" is omitted for the sake of getting this word less repetitive.
* "If any such complains arrive in my mailbox" -> "If any of them
arrive into my mailbox"
"If any such complain[t]s" duplicates the previous sentence, use some
"creativity" to make it short; like: "If any of them".
I have seen the practice of putting things INTO something, and I
suspect this somehow does apply to mailboxes even if the one in this
context is not physical.
* "I'll forward them straight into a black hole" ->
"I'll move them straight into a black hole"
I believe the point of this part was to let the potential harmbinger
know that the earlier listed types of correspondence will be deleted
without second thought.
"Forwarding" email does not necessarily imply it is "obliterated" by
said "black hole" as the recipient may still have a copy left.
* "Any death threads shall [...]" -> "Any death threats shall [...]"
I suspect this was a typo.
* "Every other form of death threads [...]" ->
"Every other form of the death threat [...]"
See the last commentary.
When "Every other form" is used, the applied subject is used as a
singular noun (I think?).
* "defemation" -> "defamation".
Taken as a typo.
* "looks an aweful lot like" -> "looks an awful lot like"
Also taken as a typo.
* "Emanual Macron" -> "Emmanuel Macron"
This is the correct spelling of his name as found on the clearnet.
* "even if you agree with that they censor now" ->
"even if you agree with what they censor now"
The original part does not make any sense to me.
The second part follows with "it'll come after what you don't want to
see censored", so this edit acts on assumption that the reader is
supposed agree with WHAT exactly odysee censors, not the fact of
censorship itself.
* "climate change zellots" -> "climate change zealots"
Not sure what "zellots" are, but I am certain it was supposed to be
"zealots".
* "aka, Communism" -> "aka Communism"
I am under belief that the comma here is not needed.
"You want to know who caused 311 back in 2011" is generally taken as
a question by the reader, and "It was me!" is interpreted as the
answer.
Replace comma with the question mark.
"more about it in the [scams](/scams) department" is better to be used
in the next sentence as the current one is already overloaded as is.
寮
Gran Noll